This
introduction does an incredible job of making a case for the way in which
Western rhetoricians have created “the rhetoric of othering.” (3) Right away
within this essay I had a realization of how small my thinking has been when
considering the other. What this introduction did was to allow exploration into
the idea that the concept of “others” is an illusion. As a student of the
Western world I have been conditioned to view minorities as the “other” without
witnessing the role the “other” plays in my education. But what this essay seems
to invoke is the idea that the “other” is in place simply because my education
has put it in place. What proves impossible through rhetoric, though, is the
ability to step away from the concept of the “other”. Never will a student of
Western rhetoric be able to view Native American rhetoric as anything but
“other” rhetoric. This is an incredibly crucial perspective for rhetoricians to
realize when studying rhetoric of “others”, that the point of view they are
coming from will always be that of a Western practice, we will never see Native
American rhetoric without the lens from which we have been raised with.
There
are so many obstacles that a Native rhetorician must push through in order to be
considered equal with a Western (European) rhetorician. “For many Native
rhetoricians, the task has been to revise, replace, or tear down these
screens.” (5) Instead of understanding their own rhetorical past, Natives must
use Western rhetorical traditions if they hope “to establish their equal
humanity with Europeans.” (5) The real work of Native rhetoricians seems to
have a shadow cast over it due to the fact that each Native writer is “addressing
an audience that generally assumes its own superiority.”(5) Yet this may be one
of Native American’s most helpful rhetorical moves. By acknowledging the
existence of the “other” identity they hold within the Western world, Native
rhetoricians can better understand the ways in which to communicate and
persuade and even manipulate in order to create and uphold a rhetoric of
survivance.
Demi,
ReplyDeleteThe "othering" was also a part that stood out to me during the reading. It articulated perfectly the words and ideas that I have been trying to formulate in my mind. I think that as readers it is important to be aware of the lens and perspectives that you automatically bring with you when studying a text. As we move further into the American Indian rhetorics, I am curious to see the different perspectives that each class member brings and how the "western" lenses play a part in our discussions.
You bring up some good points here. That is really interesting to consider that "other" is only there because we have been told that it goes there. I am realizing that I have always thought of it this way but in doing so, that seems to already set it apart in a way that doesn't allow for equality.
ReplyDelete