Throughout
our class so far we’ve been trying to define rhetoric, with it being something
more than simple persuasion. We’ve gone through many definitions, with the
simplest and most-encompassing one being the art of communication as a whole.
In this chapter, however, Watts narrows it down to being specifically the art
of persuasion. He then takes a common formula used in many cultures and
simplifies it into three parts: story, list, and sanction.
There
are many, many times when this formula is used to persuade people in a culture,
and with good reason. While the early Greeks didn’t agree with the use of
either story or sanctions in rhetoric, other cultures did find them effective. Starting
with a narrative is especially important. Narrative engages the audience,
allowing them to really connect with and understand an argument. Once the
readers are engaged, the narrative is followed by a list, adding evidence/reason
to what the narrative has already introduced, and then adding a sanction to agree
with, obey, or not interfere just adds assurances to what the reader should now
believe. It makes sense that this formula is common throughout so many cultures-
it’s a formula that works.
Of
course, since the Greeks are what’s most commonly discussed when talking about
rhetoric, this theme is not as commonly known as it should be. It’s used in so
many cultures, and has affected western rhetoric, and yet we don’t even realize
it. We base so much of our rhetorical discourse on the Greek model, but in this
case, the Greeks are the exception, and other cultures are the rule. Babylon,
Egypt, Israel, Mesopotamia, and others all used this in various contexts- to
persuade their own people as well as others, such as foreign armies and
leaders. These texts were used to warn people off, to prevent the expropriation
of land, to protect temples, to build up kings and threaten enemies with both
earthly and divine promises of destruction upon attack. The story-list-sanction
formula held wide influence in ancient societies, and is still having an effect
after all this time. The bible uses it regularly, politicians use it to persuade the public,
and many don’t even realize that such a specific formula is even at play,
because they haven’t been educated about any rhetoric except that of the
Greeks.
As usual, anything that falls outside the Greek model of rhetoric
is catching us by surprise.
No comments:
Post a Comment